1st situation:
There was a pick-up truck carryiong wood planks. The planks fell out and ended up all over the road. due to the planks falling out, a car was hit and the person inside died.
Is the pick-up truck's owner guilty or not?
2nd situation:
A car on it's way to orlando crashes into the truck carrying wood planks. The planks fall on the car and the driver dies. After that another car hits the wreckage of the pick-up truck and the first car. The man inside blows up, and dies.
Whos fault is it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
The guy who has the pick-up truck is responsible because he didnt tie down his stuff strong enough.
Why so graphic?
In the 1st situation the pick up truck guy is guilty b/c he should've taken care of his load btr
in the 2nd situation the car is in trouble b/c teh truck driver did its job but the klutzy car driver should b mor responsible and not crash .. its the car drivers fault (the one who hit the truck)
It is the owner of the trucks fault because he did not secure the planks well enough.
Jake and Seth
1st: It is the driver's fault because he was driving the truck that the wood was in.
2nd: It is the car driver's fault because he hit the truck driver in the first place.
love lubzzz and jubzzzz!!
in the first case the logs truck owner is guilty in the second case the car person should have been more careful and the family of the dead guy has to pay
evan and gabe
the guy with the wood pays all
1st: Pick up truck driver unless he was driving at a normal speed and the planks were secured but he hit a bump or pothole? Then the state should pay because the road wasnt a safe road
2nd: Would the person that the plank hit have died anyway?
we dont know if the driver could have done something to prevent it. Rabbi lala says that if there wasnt anything the driver could do then it wasnt his fault.
Rabbi Marshmallow says that for the first incident the pick up truck's owner is guilty. Except she doesn't get how the pick up truck owner could be guilty and still die.....
Rabbi Marshmallow says that for the second incident the nice young gentlemen who started the incident (the truck driver) is guilty...
COURT ADJOUNED!
rav ginsy says that for the first situation its fault is the little worker(i was gona name a race but decided not to) that tied the ropes fault. Second its the car that ran into the truck.
For both of these situations, it is the onwer of the wood planks fault
For the first situation its the truckdrivers fault for not tying down the wood good enough and for the second its whoever cuased the crashs fault
its whoever loaded the pickup truck's fault they should have loaded it better.
Post a Comment